Change size of text Print Send link til en ven

"Aquaculture, not the Internet, represents the most promising investment opportunity of the 21st Century."

- Peter Drucker, Management Expert & Economist


Economy in landbased versus seabased salmong farming

New research report reveals that at scale, landbased salmon production has a lower carbon-foorprint than salmon farmed in netcages at sea - and landbased production cost can match the seabased, if production is close to the market.

Abstract from the report:
Ocean net pen production of Atlantic salmon is approaching 2 million metric tons (MT) annually and hasproven to be cost- and energy-efficient.

Recently, with technology improvements, freshwater aquacul-ture of Atlantic salmon from eggs to harvestable size of 4-5 kg in land-based closed containment (LBCC)water recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) has been demonstrated as a viable production technology.

Land-based, closed containment water recirculating aquaculture systems technology offers the ability tofully control the rearing environment and provides flexibility in locating a production facility close tothe market and on sites where cost of land and power are competitive.

This flexibility offers distinct advantages over Atlantic salmon produced in open net pen systems, which is dependent on access to suitable coastal waters and a relatively long transport distance to supply the US market.

Consequently, in this paper we present an analysis of the investment needed, the production cost, the profitability andthe carbon footprint of producing 3300 MT of head-on gutted (HOG) Atlantic salmon from eggs to USmarket (wholesale) using two different production systems-LBCC-RAS technology and open net pen(ONP) technology using enterprise budget analysis and carbon footprint with the LCA method. In our analysis we compare the traditional open net pen production system in Norway and a model freshwaterLBCC-RAS facility in the US. The model ONP is small compared to the most ONP systems in Norway, but the LBCC-RAS is large compared to any existing LBCC-RAS for Atlantic salmon. The results need to be interpreted with this in mind.

Results of the financial analysis indicate that the total production costs for two systems are relatively similar, with LBCC-RAS only 10% higher than the ONP system on a head-on gutted basis (5.60 US$/kg versus 5.08 US$/kg, respectively).

Without interest and depreciation, the two production systems have an almost equal operating cost (4.30 US$/kg for ONP versus 4.37US$/kg for LBCC-RAS).

Capital costs of the two systems are not similar for the same 3300 MT of head-ongutted salmon. The capital cost of the LBCC-RAS model system is approximately 54,000,000 US$ and the capital cost of the ONP system is approximately 30,000,000 US$, a difference of 80%. However, theLBCC-RAS model system selling salmon at a 30% price premium is comparatively as profitable as theONP model system (profit margin of 18% versus 24%, respectively), even though its 15-year net present value is negative and its return on investment is lower than ONP system (9% versus 18%, respectively).

Read the full report here

< Tilbage til efterretninger


Akvakultur er fisk i kultur! De skal selvfølgelig have det godt og have noget at spise. Du kan fodre fiskene ved at klikke på din mus over fiskedammen!